Iowa Banking Law Blog

Not so fast CFPB: Federal Court ruling calls President’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray into question
Jan. 25, 2013John E. Lande, Iowa Banking Law Blog
White-House

Earlier today, a unanimous panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that President Obama’s recess appointment of three Members of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) is invalid. The basis of the ruling is that the United States Senate, which must give its “advice and consent” to certain nominees, was not in “recess” when President Obama made the appointments. As a result, the three NLRB appointees could not take office until the Senate had a chance to vote on whether to confirm them.

Why does this matter to banks? The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s chief—Richard Cordray—was appointed during the same Senate “recess” period. This blog has already profiled a case challenging Mr. Cordray’s appointment, and this decision from the D.C. Circuit will give ammunition to the challengers in that lawsuit.

The D.C. Circuit’s decision does place a cloud over all of the NLRB’s actions since the recess appointments. It remains to be seen what impact this will have, and what impact it could have on the CFPB’s actions if Mr. Cordray’s appointment is ultimately ruled invalid. This blog will continue to cover the fallout as it develops.

share this page:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
Categories: Banking Law, John Lande
Industry Categories: Banks & Financial Institutions
Practice Area Categories: Banking Law

John E. Lande

Email:

jlande@dickinsonlaw.com

Phone:

515.246.4509
 

Latest Articles

Too small to care? No bank is too small for cyber-attacks

This blog has continually covered how recent high profile data breaches at Target and other […]

Pick a name, any name: Bank not liable for fraudulent use of d/b/a name

In 2004, a fraudster in Missouri by the name of Henry opened a bank account […]

An agreement is an agreement: JPMorgan Chase tries to rescind permanent loan modification agreement

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that JPMorgan Chase (“Chase”) could be sued […]