Iowa Banking Law Blog

Not so fast CFPB: Federal Court ruling calls President’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray into question
Jan. 25, 2013John E. Lande, Iowa Banking Law Blog
White-House

Earlier today, a unanimous panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that President Obama’s recess appointment of three Members of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) is invalid. The basis of the ruling is that the United States Senate, which must give its “advice and consent” to certain nominees, was not in “recess” when President Obama made the appointments. As a result, the three NLRB appointees could not take office until the Senate had a chance to vote on whether to confirm them.

Why does this matter to banks? The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s chief—Richard Cordray—was appointed during the same Senate “recess” period. This blog has already profiled a case challenging Mr. Cordray’s appointment, and this decision from the D.C. Circuit will give ammunition to the challengers in that lawsuit.

The D.C. Circuit’s decision does place a cloud over all of the NLRB’s actions since the recess appointments. It remains to be seen what impact this will have, and what impact it could have on the CFPB’s actions if Mr. Cordray’s appointment is ultimately ruled invalid. This blog will continue to cover the fallout as it develops.

share this page:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
Categories: Banking Law, John Lande
Industry Categories: Banks & Financial Institutions
Practice Area Categories: Banking Law

John E. Lande

Email:

jlande@dickinsonlaw.com

Phone:

515.246.4509
 

Latest Articles

Over 100 banks under silent siege

- Co-authored with Howard O. Hagen - This weekend the New York Times revealed that […]

Target for litigation: Court rules in favor of banks suing Target for data breach

In an important ruling in December 2014, the United States District Court for the District […]

Dear bank: I want my house for free

The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case based on a Truth in Lending […]