RESULTS FOR CATEGORY: Family Law

Nov. 1, 2013The Dickinson Law Newsroom
Best-Law-Firms---DMTH

Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. has been named a Tier 1 National “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News & World Report in 2014.

Aug. 17, 2013The Dickinson Law Newsroom, Iowa Banking Law Blog, Iowa Employer Law Blog, Iowa Family Law Blog, Iowa Real Estate & Land Use Blog, Iowa Tax & Estate Planning Blog
Dickinson's Best Lawyers

Seventeen attorneys from Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2014 edition of U.S. News & World Report’s The Best Lawyers in America. This list is an annual compilation based on an exhaustive peer-review survey in which leading attorneys cast more than 3.1 million votes on the legal […]

Jul. 1, 2013Mary A. Zambreno, Iowa Family Law Blog
Child-Custody

In the case Woods v. Woods, 2013 WL 2149747 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013), the Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s ruling that the father was to be the child’s primary residential parent. The mother argued that she should have primary custody because she wanted the child to remain in his private school, while the father planned to send the child to a local public school.

Jun. 26, 2013Mary A. Zambreno, Iowa Family Law Blog
Gay-Marriage

UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013:

In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. Windsor.

Jun. 24, 2013Mary A. Zambreno, Iowa Family Law Blog
Same-sex-marriage

On March 27, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Windsor v. U.S., 699 F.3d 169 (2d Cir. 2012), a decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals holding Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) to be unconstitutional. That section defines the word “marriage,” for the purposes of federal statutes and regulations as “only a legal union between one man and one woman.”

share this page: