Another worrisome piercing case
Posted on 12/13/2009 at 12:03 PM by The Newsroom
This time it's the US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia that is the culprit. Let's hope the context of this ruling is important. The issue was one of venue, not liability. Here are the relevant facts. Rayonier Wood Products bought a lumber grading system from ScanWare. FinScan, a Finnish company, was not a party to the contract and at the time was only a minority owner of ScanWare. About 15 months later FinScan acquired 100% of the stock of ScanWare. As you might imagine, Rayonier was not happy with the performance of the grading system and sued ScanWare and FinScan. Because the contract between Raynoier and ScanWare contained a choice of law provision, Rayonier filed the action in Georgia. I'm going to skip over the procedural details to tell you simply that there was a dispute over the proper venue for the case and the question came down to whether FinScan was bound by the choice of law provision in a contract it didn't sign and at a time when it was only a minority shareholder to one of the signatories. Of course, I wouldn't be writing this if the answer was anything but YES.
The material in this blog is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. Please consult with an attorney if specific legal information is needed.
Categories: Commercial Litigation
Questions, Contact us today.
The material, whether written or oral (including videos) that is posted on the various blogs of Dickinson Law is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. The opinions expressed in the various blog posting are those of the individual author, they may not reflect the opinions of the firm. Your use of the Dickinson Law blog postings does NOT create an attorney-client relationship between you and Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its attorneys. If specific legal information is needed, please retain and consult with an attorney of your own selection.