Charging orders and single member LLCs

Iowa Commercial Litigation Dickinson Law Firm Des Moines, Iowa

Posted on 07/05/2010 at 02:08 PM by The Newsroom

Applying partnership principles to single member entities can sometimes create havoc.  Enter the case of Olmsted v. FTC (SC08-1009, June 24, 2010).  The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals certified a question of Florida law to the Florida Supreme Court asking the Florida court if the charging order provision of Florida’s LLC Act permitted a court to order a debtor to surrender all of his or her rights in a single member LLC membership interest to a judgment creditor, not just the economic rights (the right to distributions).  Applying the hoary judicial principle if you don’t like the answer change the question, the Florida Supreme Court broadened the question to ask whether Florida law permitted the surrender of the entire interest (the right to vote and manage the affairs of the LLC in addition to receiving distributions). The Florida Supreme Court answered its own question in the affirmative, relying on the theory that LLC interests were akin to corporate stock (wrong!) and therefore subject to the general execution laws of the state.  It also relied on the fact that unlike the Florida partnership and limited partnership statutes that made charging orders the exclusive remedy for judgment creditors, the Florida LLC provision on charging orders omitted the word exclusive. This decision will create confusion in those states that likewise do not include the word exclusive in their statutes.  Charging orders effectively preclude creditors from becoming “partners” with the other non-debtor owners of the entity.  In single member LLCs it makes sense that charging orders are not the exclusive remedy, albeit it takes some judicial jujitsu to get there.  It does not make sense in LLCs with more than one member, and in effect makes LLC interests more like corporate stock than they are intended to be. 

The material in this blog is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. Please consult with an attorney if specific legal information is needed.

Categories: Commercial Litigation

 

Questions, Contact us today.

 


The material, whether written or oral (including videos) that is posted on the various blogs of Dickinson Law is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. The opinions expressed in the various blog posting are those of the individual author, they may not reflect the opinions of the firm.  Your use of the Dickinson Law blog postings does NOT create an attorney-client relationship between you and Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its attorneys.  If specific legal information is needed, please retain and consult with an attorney of your own selection.

Comments
There are no comments yet.
Add Comment

* Indicates a required field