With this ring, I thee wed . . . or not
Posted on 08/16/2012 at 12:18 PM by Mary Zambreno
Who keeps the engagement ring when the wedding is called off? Where you happen to live will determine the answer. Each side will ultimately argue that the other party called off the wedding and will use that to justify the reason why he or she should keep the ring. Some states indeed examine who was at fault in terminating the engagement when determining who will keep the ring. In Iowa, however, this is irrelevant. In Fierro v. Hoel, 465 N.W.2d 669, 672 (Iowa App. 1990), the Court of Appeals ruled that an engagement ring given in contemplation of marriage is an impliedly conditional gift; it is a contemplated gift only upon marriage. If the wedding is called off, for whatever reason, the gift is not capable of becoming a contemplated gift and must be returned to the donor. The donor did not have to justify whether or not he was at fault for the termination of the wedding. Does the donor also keep the ring in the event of a divorce regardless of fault? In Iowa, once the condition that is, marriage is met, the ring becomes a gift to the recipient, classified as his or her separate property upon divorce. In the case In re Marriage of Fenton, 789 N.W.2d 165 (Iowa App. 2010), the wife argued that there were certain items of jewelry that should not have been classified as marital property subject to division because they were gifts. The husband did not dispute they were gifts but argued that the Iowa Code section dealing with division of assets contemplated only gifts from third parties, not gifts between spouses. The Court disagreed, stating that the statute states simply that gifts are separate property. Nothing in the statute excludes gifts between spouses. So brides and grooms, take note: Steer clear of that pawn shop . . . for now. Article reference 2ANUTAUXBT6W.
The material in this blog is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. Please consult with an attorney if specific legal information is needed.
- Mary Zambreno
Questions, Contact us today.
The material, whether written or oral (including videos) that is posted on the various blogs of Dickinson Law is not intended, nor should it be construed or relied upon, as legal advice. The opinions expressed in the various blog posting are those of the individual author, they may not reflect the opinions of the firm. Your use of the Dickinson Law blog postings does NOT create an attorney-client relationship between you and Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its attorneys. If specific legal information is needed, please retain and consult with an attorney of your own selection.